I feel obligated to say something about McDonalds because, as the Talmud says, "Silence is akin to assent." The full truth of my conclusion I shall develop in the course of this letter but the conclusion's general outline is that McDonalds is firmly convinced that you and I are objects for it to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings. Its belief is controverted, however, by the weight of the evidence indicating that McDonalds always cavils at my attempts to make the world safe for democracy. That's probably because if there's one thing that McDonalds's good at, it's spreading the germs of hatred, of discord and jealously, of dissolution and decomposition. McDonalds claims that it does the things it does "for the children". I would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another nettlesome attempt to give an air ofWe have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we view the realms of McCarthyism and interdenominationalism not as two opposing poles but as two continua, or is it sufficient to dispense justice? If you feel that McDonalds's debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research then you won't understand my answer no matter how carefully I explain it. You won't understand my answer if you insist that McDonalds has achieved sainthood. However, you have a chance at understanding my answer if you're open-minded enough to realize that that which is built inextricably into the laws of the universe cannot be completely obscene. Disguised in this drollery is an important message: I intend to look closely at McDonalds's projects to see what makes them so effectual at turning politicos loose against us good citizens. I should expect to find -- this is a guess that I currently lack sufficient knowledge to verify -- that McDonalds oppresses its critics by crushing them, expelling them, pauperizing them, and cutting them off from families and friends. That said, let me continue.
McDonalds will do everything in its power to shatter and ultimately destroy our most precious possessions. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; McDonalds's catch-phrases have merged with mercantalism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that McDonalds may be generating. And both make a big deal out of nothing.
McDonalds sees only one side of the issue. Let me rephrase that: McDonalds speaks like a true defender of the status quo -- a status quo, we should not forget, that enables it to create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind. If McDonalds continues to dupe people into believing that we should avoid personal responsibility, I will be obliged to do something about it. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations.
To simplify, you should be sure to let me know your ideas about how to deal with McDonalds. I am eager to listen to your ideas and I hope that I can grasp their essentials, evaluate their potential, look for flaws, provide suggestions, absorb feedback, suggest improvements, and then put the ideas into effect. Only then can we champion the force of goodness against the greed of the most dissolute soi-disant do-gooders I've ever seen. Before McDonalds initiated a misoneism flap to help promote its purblind pleas, people everywhere were expected to initiate meaningful change. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that I would sooner let McDonalds force me to contract leprosy and be forced to live out my benighted days shunned by humanity, ringing a bell, and shying away from sharps and open flames than become one of its advocates. For that reason, McDonalds hates it when you say that its squibs run contrary to even the most cursory observation of the real world. It really hates it when you say that. Try saying that to it sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having it shriek insults at you.
McDonalds, quixotic swindlers, and a few decent but occasionally socially inept people are engaged in a desperate struggle for the soul of society, but I won't linger on that. While it's true that McDonalds rather grandiloquently refers to me and everyone else it dislikes as a dotty self-proclaimed arbiter of taste and standard, it has yet to acknowledge that fact. Ladies and gentlemen, you don't need to look far to see that McDonalds functions not as a social critic, but as an unoriginal imitator of the ruling ideologues. That fact may not be pleasant but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter.
McDonalds's method (or school, or ideology -- it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of "McDonalds-ism". It is a disorderly and avowedly surly philosophy that aims to sidetrack us, so we can't declare a truce with McDonalds and commence a dialogue. Why does McDonalds want to encumber the religious idea with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus bring religion into a totally unnecessary conflict with science? I believe it's to create such chaotic conditions in our lives that we'll welcome massive regulation, police restraints, and New World Order socialist oppression just to get order again. If you don't believe me then consider that there is nothing McDonalds wants more than to impede the free flow of information. And here, I profess, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in its cajoleries. McDonalds seeks scapegoats for its own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target it can find, that is, ignominious barmpots. I am not fooled by McDonalds's dangerous and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that McDonalds ought to realize that the most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do. Unfortunately, it tends to utter so much verbiage about classism that I can conclude only that what we're seeing is a domino effect of events that started with McDonalds stating that it is manipulative to question its tractates. That prevarication incited its lieutenants to weaken our mental and moral fiber. Splenetic spoilsports reacted, in turn, by increasing society's cycle of hostility and violence. The next domino to fall, not surprisingly, was a widespread increase in deconstructionism, and that's the event that galvanized me to tell everyone that McDonalds is the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to its codices.
You should not ask, "How much longer can we tolerate McDonalds's voluble commentaries before the whole country collectively throws up?", but rather, "What exactly is the principle that rationalizes McDonalds's fastidious ipse dixits?". The latter question is the better one to ask because McDonalds is inherently incompetent, abominable, and malicious. Oh, and it also has a self-serving mode of existence. McDonalds always looks the other way when one of its spokesmen gets it in his head to subject human beings to indignities. Apparently, the principle laid down by Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois during the French Reign of Terror still holds true today: Tout est permis à quiconque agit dans le sens de la révolution.
McDonalds should not confuse, disorient, and disunify. Not now, not ever. An axiom among McDonalds's vicegerents is that McDonalds can exploit other cultures for self-entertainment and get away with it. Of course, it's not that simple. McDonalds descends from a long line of prudish, predaceous cowards who like to violate the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. Let me explain. A central point of McDonalds's belief systems is the notion that we ought to worship disgusting, soporific criticasters as folk heroes. Perhaps it should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think it'd find that it swears that faddism is the key to world peace. Clearly, it's living in a world of make-believe, with flowers and bells and leprechauns and magic frogs with funny little hats. Back in the real world, McDonalds says it's going to pervert human instincts by suppressing natural, feral constraints and encouraging abnormal patterns of behavior in a matter of days. Good old McDonalds. It just loves to open its mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how dour they sound.
This much is clear: McDonalds has compiled an impressive list of grievances against me. Not only are all of these grievances completely fictitious, but McDonalds has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice with directionless, besotted evildoers. Is this because it needs their help to exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation? The answer is rather depressing but I'll tell you anyway. The answer begins with the observation that McDonalds keeps saying that every word that leaves its mouth is teeming with useful information. For some reason, McDonalds's slaves actually believe this nonsense. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.
scientific impartiality to bias
Your Views?
Interesting article, but unfortunately most people are subdued and distracted with trashy T.V. and recreational drugs to be bothered to read your article in depth. It quite shocking that people see it as too long, because people want to be entertained and not to use there brains in understanding big important issues. If your article was about Bush putting poison in our food directly, people would still say - ah that's too long I'm not going to read it! Most people are brainwashed and if you try and tell them about the New World order's plans they respond in a brainwashed fashion, defending the government and buying in to the stereotypical attack on the messenger as a quack, unpatriotic or terrorist.
The best weapon to use against McDonalds is not to eat there. Continue your message but reduce the information to a digestible level for those not used to such a level of reading. McDonalds influence policy, because they pay for holidays and other gifts of the politicians. They are bribing the politicians and therefore it is very difficult to affect policy against them. They also have the best lawyers. The amount of chemicals they put in their food is disgusting and leads to cancer. One woman has kept a McDonalds muphin in a box for six years and it still looks good enough to eat. They are helping the government make us all sick, they encourage diabetes, cancer and obesity. The pharmaceutical industry is the second largest money making racket on the planet. There so much money to be made in the sickness industry before they kill us off. It adds to their population reduction. There are cures for cancer but you won’t see any in the main stream media because the elites control that too.
Reply:I don't think it was necessarily the length of your answer that was the problem, maybe the length of your sentences - and their structure. You need to communicate with people.. not rant at them. Just work on your writing and you'll probably get a better response. Many people have serious issues with the way McDonalds do business, this is not new, and there has been alot of work published about the issues (the McLibel case in 1997 accounted for some of the best of this - Helen Steel and Dave Morris, greenpeace, also Naomi Klein), and the reason these campaigns have been so successful is that they didn't talk down to people and respected the intelligence of their audience. I was wondering also how you are 'trying to make the world safe for democracy' - those are the exact words that George Bush used when trying to justify the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq... hoping that wasn't intentional! ;)
Reply:I'm not reading that! I'm going to order a cheeseburger from McDonald...
Reply:Wow! That's long!!!!!!!!
Reply:No.
Reply:if i wanted to read a dissitation i would be a college lecturer
Reply:You're wasting your time cos like I say no-one is gonna bother reading that.
Reply:erm what was the question ????
Reply:McDonald's and it's agenda taking over the world fast food market (which is feeding people crap food and a crap ethos) is the same principle that the NWO agenda has (keep people in the dark, feed them on crap, appear innocently in places you least expect)
Reply:couldnt be bothered to read, no offence
Reply:WOWWW. I can't be bothered reading anything about McDonalds.
Long thing...
genealogy mormon
No comments:
Post a Comment